What a fascinating tale! I get a bit fed up with the politically correct mob telling the world that Muslims/Arabs have contributed so much to humanity. Most of that story is spin. Compared to the religious domination of Catholic Europe in the Dark Ages the Arab Muslim world was advanced and progressive but that is like saying a New York winter is warmer than a Siberian winter. Yes, New York is warm-er, but don't go there in shorts! Religion, especially a single religious culture, is bad news for all forms of innovation and the freedom of thought that allows it to happen. Islam contributed nothing directly to the advancement of humanity. Some people who coincidentally were Muslims contributed some art, science and literature. Islam helped the advance of culture in general because of its teaching of Arabic reading and writing. Arabic became a medium for the spreading of ideas, just as Latin was in European Chistendom and English is today. All the positive effects of Islam in its golden age were side-effects, not the planned outcome of a positively Islamic strategy. Much of what the Islamic world contributed was done by the rediscovery, translation and circulation of documents and ideas which originated in Pagan societies, work done or collected by Greek and Roman scholars. It was not Islam as such that was the engine for progress, it was literacy, international communication, trade and an interest in collecting and preserving the knowledge and wisdom of other times and other cultures. The Islamic golden age was a golden age of human culture. It was driven by a unity of language and literary culture in a pluralistic and open international framework. Today we have a much better engine: free global trade; international global capitalism and the English language. This is a secular global culture, it grew from Christian societies that were themselves changing into secular societies. The future belongs to global culture, secular culture, to the Cosmopolitans: the citizens of the world. The Greeks were not great civilizers because of what they believed in, but because of what they didn't believe in. We will move into a great future because of what we share and because on matters of religion we agree largely to differ in silence, we don't let differences in religion come between us and business and we don't let differences in belief systems shut us off from learning from foreign cultures. When a culture sees difference as a challenge and an opportunity and not a threat great things can be achieved. Modern western secular culture has, for the most part, attained that maturity. Christianity and the Death of Civilization Martin |
AtheismPoliticsLifeFeedbackForumBlogHome
Islamic ThreatIslam and WomenYou Don't Have to be AhmadFemale CircumcisionIslam is NOT a RaceChristianity and the Death of CivilizationRespect for IslamThe Ground Zero MosqueMeme WarfareI'd Rather be a Bright than a DhimmiWe are ALL Geert WildersEngland and the Islamic ThreatI'm not a Racist, I'm mad as HellBeing HumanistReligion's Dirtiest TricksLebanese AtheistBoudicca Drives Back the Islamic HordeSacrificeBeyond PC: Politically AcceptableAsk the Ex-MormonSwords, Prophets and the Weakness of GodsBeheading in IslamFitna, Geert Wilders and the Death of European FreedomThe Jewish Question
|
Tweet |
© 1999 - 2011 by Martin Willett. |
mwillett.org: Debate Unlimited |