HOW THERE YOU!!!!!!Hello, The Queen does a hell of a lot for this country! Also if I get any Spam you will be reported as it is against the law. And you do not want to know what I think of you in my own thoughts, as they are not nice ones! Daniel Jellyman |
Would you like to actually list what the Queen does and explain why it cannot be done by anybody else for a fraction of the cost without having the people of this country permanently bowing to somebody because of which bed they were born in? What does "how there you" mean? It isn't what I recognize as English, the Queen's or anybody else's. I am far more English than Elizabeth Windsor, who is of largely German descent and married to a German descended man who somehow got to be a Greek prince. England is where I, an Englishman, belong. It is my duty to make England better. Getting rid of outmoded institutions such as monarchy and your style of simple-minded deference is a great start. What is against the law Daniel? I made it very clear that I will publish your email and if you don't want that to happen don't send the message. That was as plain as Princess Anne. It seems to me that you have volunteered to have your email published. If you don't like the consequences of the action you chose to take you have nobody else to blame but yourself. I think people who misrepresent the law should be charged with an offence, it cannot be right that ignorance of the law is no defence and yet people are free to misrepresent what the law is and pull bogus laws out of their arse at the drop of a hat. What exactly are the terms of this hypothetical You can't do that, that's spamming law you think exists and when was it passed? -- http://mwillett.org |
To Mr Martin Willett, First I would like thank you for pointing out the grammar mistake. I am truly sorry. I also have a lot of respect towards people, which wants the country to be better. But you do not have all my respect, as you are a republican I believe. The law, which I said, does not exist like you say. It normally scares people off from spaming I find. Also I am happy for the emails to be published. I stand up for what I believe in. We do not 'bow' down to her. America is a good example. You
might agree that Gorge Bush is not the greatest President the
US has ever had. The Queen along with stopping and passing bills, which the
government put though she is also a symbol and this country.
Which has a lot of History. So she is not old fashioned because
she was not born in 1700 for example. To elect the head of state
we as taxpayers have to pay more to start a election. This is
more than we pay the Queen in two years. The modern British public don’t mind the Queen. Like Spain, which just reinstated the Monarch. If she left were would the Church be, I go to Church so I and
others would have to make do with another religion, which we
don’t want. Yours faithfully Daniel |
Why do you assume we need an elected president? To answer my own question it is the only way to make her Madge seem like a bargain. The Queen doesn't do anything, she is a figurehead for an unelected and unseen "Buckingham Palace" machine. Everything the Queen does could be done by either the Speaker of the House of Commons or senior civil servants such as ambassadors. No new staff would be needed and certainly no elections. Have you actually read the page you are overreacting to? England has plenty of history to be proud of without making any reference to royalty. As to the Church of England it should be disestablished at once. Establishment is a terrible anachronism which does no service to either the state or the Church. If the Church wants to have the Queen as its head then by all means, as long as neither the Church nor the monarchy is formally connected with the state I care not one jot what you decide to do with her. The idea that getting rid of the monarchy would somehow stop people belonging to the Church that wanted to belong is madness. The Church should be like any other religious order, open to all voluntary members. Compulsory membership of a church is a terrible idea, it is a violation of Prince Charles' human rights to make him the leader of the Church just because he is his mother's son. -- http://mwillett.org |
Why should she not be the Queen? Why should she not lead us?
You don’t have to answer any of them. If we do not want
a monarch. Yours Faithfully Daniel |
I want everybody to have an equal chance, but not to be equal. You want to be subservient and it seems like that is the natural order of things. You're not very smart. You know your place. You are probably happiest on your knees. I on the other hand do not want to be made to look up to people who are more stupid than I am. Why would you want somebody else to get something for nowt? -- http://mwillett.org |
Dear Martin I am not stupid! And I know my place. My GOD SIR I am higher
in society than you. My family has worked its way up. Yours not a thick as you Dan P.S |
I judge people as I find them. You come across as stupid. You have offered no reasons for your beliefs and you have done nothing to defend your views. All you have done is express your views while your language use has been decidedly below par. Why has the Royal family deserved to be higher than me? How can a family deserve anything? You have offered no reasons at all. If you have no reasons to justify your beliefs you should silently slip away not get more and more agitated. I have offered plenty of reasons to explain my attitude to the institution of royalty and to explain why it is corrosive to the social and moral fibre of the nation and how Britain or England could easily manage without a monarchy. All you have done is get hysterical and rant. I think you have no solid reasoning behind your attitude, no reasoning that you can frame and defend. I am quite prepared to believe your family has worked its way up, but what have you done? The reason for getting rid of the monarchy is to get rid of the idea that people count because of their families and their family's wealth. Your family may have been hard working, entrepreneurial or shrewd wheeler-dealers quick-witted enough not to get caught. Whatever the story that does not make you any more or less than what you are in your own skin. An idiot son of a Duke is just as much of an idiot as the idiot son of a dustman or the idiot son of a self-made millionaire. Your sensitivity to class makes me think you are quite happy to get more than you yourself deserve and ride on the achievements of your family. I was quite prepared to listen to you justify your views but all I can perceive is strength of feeling and a total lack of rational thought. Have you started shaving yet? -- http://mwillett.org |
Shaving? Yes. The monach. Should still be here. You sound to
me like a communist. |
You claim to have many reasons for keeping the monarch but you haven't offered any of them. It seems to me you want to keep the monarchy for the same reason I want to remove it: because it is a symbol of the past, of privilege, "breeding" and of and wealth, rank and respect earned by earlier generations passed on to their offspring. How can anybody be born deserving of rank and respect? Prince Charles had the finest education money could buy and achieved a mediocre degree. He isn't clever, he isn't smart or shrewd or a beacon of morality. He hasn't got an appreciation of the national character and he does not seem to be in touch with the mood of the nation. He doesn't represent anything that requires representing and he was not selected for the job in any way. How can you defend that? I see you are avoiding doing so. -- http://mwillett.org |
The Queen theoretically. she can still start a war and she
can still dissolve parliment! |
"At the cost of 82p per person per year why should it be someone who does not desreve it? "
Isn't that MY point? (apart from the spelling mistake)
How the hell can being born to the right mother at a particular time make anybody deserve a job, any job? What did you do to deserve to be born to your mother when you were? What job on the public payroll do you deserve to get for managing to do that?
Why don't you read the page? For the love of humanity read the page and you will see what I am proposing so you don't need to ask those rhetorical questions that you think are so clever, I have already anticipated them all and answered them.
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org
So you are saying from what I can see is that you should not
get something from being born. Well let’s say we get rid
of the Monarch and just have a MP. Yours Daniel |
I think I will have to take this slowly, but that will only work if you read it slowly too. Can you do that? Lip movements are optional. Being born doesn't make anybody qualified to be Prime Minister. To become Prime Minister a person has to become elected to the House of Commons and lead or at least gain the full support of a political party which has a majority of the seats in the House. To do this usually takes somebody of exceptional ability. Elizabeth Windsor has no educational qualifications and no vocational qualifications. Her CV reads:
What gives the Prime Minister the right to be Prime Minister? The will of the people expressed through parliament. Nobody gets to be Prime Minister without being bright, quick-witted and respected. Like them or loathe them any fair-minded person has to see that British Prime Ministers are never drooling idiots, you simply cannot be a simpleton and get to lead a major political party in Britain. You can be King just by being the first child the right mother has with a dick. (Yes, that sentence is ambiguous, I'll leave it like that).
If we elect a shower of wankers into a majority in parliament we may end up with somebody not very good as Prime Minister, but we're not going to be stuck with them until they die. A country doesn't need a figurehead who is a real person. The job of figurehead is best left to statues and mythical characters such as Britannia, John Bull, Uncle Sam or Marianne. Uncle Sam never gets caught in bed with his valet or talking to trees. Marianne never gets criticized for getting the air force to take her and some chums golfing. Britannia never gets divorced and John Bull has never been suspected of conspiracy to murder or having been cuckolded by his wife. -- http://mwillett.org |
Atheism
Politics
Life
Feedback
Forum
Blog
Home