My name is ############.
I am a 16 year old student from King's
Lynn, Norfolk. Before contacting you, I wanted to read most,
if not all, of your site. However, I have decided that this
is impossible within the two weeks before I return to school
and need to apply my intellectual capacity to remembering my
new timetable, etc.
On Thursday, I will receive my GCSE results.
I am pretty sure I want to take English, History, Religious
Ethics & Philosophy, Psychology and Classics for A-Level.
This is probably of limited interest to
you, and no doubt you get a fair few people telling you their
life story. But it forms a basis for me to tell my story. My
reasoning is that by knowing who I am, you can better appreciate
who reads your site (thus tailoring future content), and view
the comments that I make in the context of my circumstances.
From first glance your site won me over. It was easy to navigate,
and when I read a sample article, I bookmarked it forthwith
for future perusal. It has been thought provoking and to an
extent inspiring. Your job, as you say, is "what" you are, not "who" you
are. It is bordering on quasi-poetic in an almost perverse way,
that a thinker like you should be an electronics salesperson.
But as you say in your advice for the young, we have to be careful
about what message people are giving, and who pays for it. Your
work on the site is in pursuit of the truth, and it is trustworthy
because of who you are more than if it came from a "scientist" or "professor" or "official".
I think basically what I am attempting
to say (although in trying to do so, I have veered off at a
tangent) is keep up the excellent work, and I hope that I can
bounce ideas off you as part of my Ethics & Philosophy course,
as need necessitates.
I am an atheist. I do not believe in a
god, and this has come about through a self-decision that the
decision was utter bullshit. My parents never attempted to indoctrinate
me in any particular way (this includes AGAINST religion), but
let me come to my own conclusions. My primary school, however,
did try but failed to impress me.
Just in the same way that when my school-chums
in Year One believed in Father Christmas, I dismissed the concept
as ridiculous in the extreme and proceeded to pick holes in
it. My parents didn't tell me one way or another; they waited
for me to ask THEM. For this, I am appreciative. It has always
encouraged me to be analytical FIRST in my approach to a concept
or theory, come to my own conclusions then cross-reference these
with other peoples' beliefs.
I understand that I am still young, impressionable
and to an extent naive, but your thoughts have been a source
of amusement and stimulation throughout my otherwise work- and
drink- filled summer holiday. And to think I just stumbled across
your site. I can't even remember where from now! Your down-to-earth
nature is particularly appealing -- you seem approachable. You
are not a "Big Thinker" with his head stuck in the clouds. You
are an intelligent bloke who happens to have a real life too.
Perhaps my favourite quote would be your
opinion on Christianity. Couldn't "Mostly Harmless" simply be
a label for the earth in general? ;-) I was 10 (I think) when
I first read The Hitch Hikers' Guide to the Galaxy and loved
it. It's on this note of the larger galactic picture that I
move to my next point.
Your idea of a Global Government, but it
would be difficult to ever implement for the reason that the
people in power love it too much to willingly give it up. It
IS the only true solution for a progression into the 21st Century,
but we will be hard pressed to achieve it in an age of global
monopoly and bought-influence by multi-national giants. My friend
Jamie and I (after a few pints) joked that it would take an
extra-terrestrial (alien possibly, or a big comet or something)
threat to unite the people of the earth. We would have to be
faced with a situation so serious that the implications of NOT
acting together and joining as one would mean our destruction
as a species. This, I fear, could be the only practicable way
for us to unite. Is there any way you could think of that could
result in a proper global government ever being instituted?
Not that I actually believe in UFOs or abductions. I am proud
to say that I wasn't taken in by the Blair Witch Project, and
how many people can say that, huh?! LoL.
Well, thank you for your time. No doubt
I've taken up enough of it!
Yours,
GUS |
Thank you for the message. Encouragement like that is my royalty
cheque.
I do think that I have a slightly stronger claim to be able
to seek the truth than many other people who are stuck in professional
positions. Imagine that some media star like Howard Stern or
Kilroy discovered the ultimate truth of the universe was dull
and mundane (it's 42, that's it) what would he do? It might
be the end of his career to reveal it. If you are in the media
what you want is a continuing controversy. You don't want pot
legalized because that would end the debate. Scandal sells.
MTV presenters would not reveal that Eminem is a wuss who drinks
milk and goes to bed by nine every night, or that his music
is massively overrated. Music that is selling must be good and
the artists that make it must be credible. They can only afford
to puncture the egos of a handful of stars at one time or they
get kicked off the air. They would certainly never dare to say
that the speed of record sales over a seven day period was anything
less than the most important thing in the lives of any teenager.
Your lecturers would not tell you that the subject they are
teaching is not as intellectually rigorous as the one's they
failed their exams in or that the qualification it leads to
is relatively worthless.
Where are the academics studying the differences in human groups
in relation to intelligence and other behaviours? Avoiding the
issue, somebody else will ask, or might do, or probably won't,
but still, they won't go near it. Things are so much easier
if we gloss over them and imagine the issue was decided at some
time in the past. Some debates get buried because they are too
politically incorrect to discuss. If I was an academic I would
feel drawn to such areas, like a moth to a flame.
"I want to study so called racial differences in intelligence,
I need money."
"Are you
some kind of racist?"
"Is that a no? Do you have to be? Would you prefer it if
I was? Sorry to disappoint, I am just curious, I thought curiosity
was the stock in trade of universities, I am sorry I have
wasted your time."
Global government
I don't have a blueprint for a short to medium term strategy.
The best I can offer is using the power of the internet to keep
asking the question. Why is a world government unthinkable?
Who would suffer? It seems obvious to me that a world government would stifle
creativity. This is an advantage. Most things that need inventing
have been invented, many things that should not be invented
are about to be developed. In a world with competing powers
everything is allowed to develop because some country will see
a short-term advantage in it. Human cloning for research will
happen, it is a certainty. Somewhere there will also be human
reproductive cloning. Perhaps Switzerland or Liberia or some
other place that claims the absolute right to tell the rest
of lifekind to bugger off and mind its own business. We need
to erode the basis of that presumed absolute right, sovereignty
needs to be wrestled from the hands of nation states and given
to the people of the world.
Technology is a genie that demands to get out its bottle. When
that technology offers fewer practical advantages than harmful
side effects it would be better to have one single bottle so
we only have to worry about holding in a single stopper. Think
about the biological and chemical weapons being developed by
the UK and USA, the logic seems to be "we must because others
might". That does not follow. By having a global government
there would be no need to make such weapons. The only people
who might make them would be terrorists, and they cannot be
either deterred or fought by weapons of mass destruction.
A war of the worlds would be a way to harness the world. A
short-term threat might not suffice. I wish I had a simple solution
to get the world united. The best I can offer is the idea that
if enough people talk about it the people will listen and eventually
the benefits will become clear. All I can do is to keep that
debate going as best I can.
Understanding that you are young and impressionable is a good
start. We are all impressionable to a degree. I have found that
I have been cynical and analytical for many years, but age improves
the skill. No doubt this ability will plateau shortly and then
decline at some stage as I get older and begin to lose my faculties,
but my experience of other people is that critical faculties
grow with age and can remain sharp for quite a long time after
other signs of reduced function. At your age creativity and
energy should be near their peak. Many poets are past it at
25. The greatest breakthroughs in physics seem to come to people
in a narrow window between the learning of the basic tools of
analysis and mathematics and the declining ability for the highest
possible creativity of thought. There is no ideal age. At 16
a man is at his sexual peak, but he will probably not learn
half the techniques and strategies he will eventually master
until he is twice that age, maybe more.
Feel free to ask me anything you want, but don't ask me to
write your essays.
I'm not sure
about you, but I am a little scared by the news today
about the World Trade Center. Just a year ago, I stood
at the top of it.
I just wondered where you think
the world will go from here. Do you think it could
end in a war, even a world war? I personally believe
this is only the first phase. The second attack will
come perhaps tomorrow; perhaps a little longer in
the future. I think the next stage is a major attack
on the Internet. It is a logical progression -- create
chaos in a physical form, then strike at utilities
and security services.
Perhaps I've read too much Tom
Clancy, perhaps I'm over imaginative. However, an
event of such magnitude with years of planning --
I would make it even larger than this. It seems a
logical progression to carry out another attack to
catch us unprepared again -- an idea nobody seems
to have considered. For once in my life, I am scared
by a massive event that could blow itself out of proportion.
My generation have had no war or conflict that has
had a direct threat or bearing.
What do you think will happen
next?
Kindest regards,
GUS |
I have changed my mind on this one. Killing 100 people
is an act or terrorism. Killing over 10,000 has
to be seen as an act of war as well as a crime.
The ideal scenario I would like to see is a variation
of the classic tactic my mother used to great effect
in her work as a prison officer; shaping up to smack
the opponent round the head and at the last moment a
surprise attack elsewhere. I would love to see Bin Laden
or whoever is responsible running to his air raid shelter
to find a platoon of SEALs waiting to take him off to
The Hague.
Airstrikes are justified and the whole of the world
has to get onside or be seen as the enemy.
Martin |
I have a friend
who is in the RAF, just having completed his Advanced
Pilot Training. I received a call from him yesterday
about 5pm telling me that things had really hit the
fan. Within the military (as far as I can discern),
they are definitely preparing for the possibility of
a full-out strike at a target. All units are being made
ready for front line combat. I hope that this is just
some sort of precaution.
In hindsight, my babble yesterday
about a "second strike" does seem a little paranoid
today. But I wouldn't put it past Bush (if only we
still had Clinton!) to do something stupid and reactionary.
It's at times like this when true allies are revealed.
It only takes somebody to decide "what the hell, we
never much liked the USA anyway", and others could
follow. I'm no expert on the situation of International
Relations, but they do seem fragile at the best of
times. As you say, the fact that it was kept so covert
seems to suggest a small group with large resources.
Yes, arresting and bringing to
justice the perpetrators is the most sane way to deal
with the situation, but will it satisfy those gun-toting
Southerners and right-wing extremists who seems to
have a little too much influence over the US? Everybody
is calling this a second Pearl Harbor. Will the American
public (and the rest of the world) expect some act
of vengeance in proportion to Hiroshima or Nagasaki?
A futile gesture it may be, but why shouldn't Bush
give the people what they want? I agree it is the
wrong way to proceed, but how often has history shown
us to be hot-headed by nature; not prepared to step
back and look at things rationally?
Interesting times indeed, but
still worrying. A friend who goes to school in New
Jersey has just described the reactions of her co-pupils
when they found at their parents and families who
work in the WTC and Wall St. might not be coming home.
What makes it even more scary is the fact that I was
there once and vowed to go back -- it was a terrific
sight over New York. Now I can't. Still, I am feeling
more relaxed today. I am glad that for the most part
life has gone on more or less normally in King's Lynn.
At least I haven't had time to sit and think about
it and get my brain working paranoid-overtime!
Thanks for your reply,
and best regards,
GUS |
The following was sent in response to a Forum posting in which GUS confessed
to being a little the worse for drink. At the time so was I...
 |
Feel free to contribute material when drunk.
Some of my best email was sent while I was scarcely
able to discern the difference between the keys. The
only problem with emailing when drudgery is that your
spellchecker mighty contraband your errata with mistresses
of its own. And then the excrescence will reality hit
the extramural.
But fuchsia hit, I say, jest go foul it.
By the way, what is your tittle? I fancy a bit of west
count rocket fuel myself. Scrumptious is goad, but not
that whinge library stuff, it is for windows, teenage
and Studebakers. In the morning your head feels like
somebody has used it for foolscap practised an your
tong tastes like an orange uterus has shot on it.
Martin |
I'll have to
admit a profound liking for Guinness, although I can
only drink it when I'm in the mood. A few pints of that
burnt-silk is enough to get me well on the way to a
glorious night out. Then, depending how ambitious I'm
feeling, I generally experiment with whatever I'm foolish
enough to think, "hmm, sounds nice..." Repeat until
comfortably horizontal. Wake up in the morning with
head feeling like somebody has used it for foolscap
practised an your tong tastes like an orange uterus
has shot on it. Or something... :-)
Just looking over my posting,
I seemed to be able to type fairly coherently, which
comes as something as a shock. You are of course correct;
I too find my musings are better when inspired and
coaxed along by a hefty dose of an alcoholic beverage.
Spellcheckers? For wimps! Ha, who needs them?! Well,
they have gone a long way to enhancing our Internet
society, for those who actually use them. I personally
get annoyed when people can so easily use them, but
choose not to. It's slothenliness to the worst degree.
But how many times have I written an English essay
when drunk and find, accompanied with a gay trill
of laughter, that it has just changed every reference
to "Stalin" to "Starling". Or I'll hit the insert
key by mistake and find that my most recent thoughts
have been devouring my previous writing PacMan like.
i also hate people who seem to
have lost all ability to type with punctuation or
follow even the most simple grammatical rules they
usually end up with a sentence like this i then have
to spend hours analysing it to decide what it is supposed
to say it is usually not worth the effort
What are your pet hates? I'd
love to know! Well, I have to go and listen to about
37 LPs for my A-level music homework. Beats struggling
retard-like with a page full of simple maths equations!
How I'm glad that we can choose what subjects we like
now... Will no doubt be posting to the Forum again
soon.
Like the new snazzy layout.
Catch you soon.
GUS.
PS: I cannot access your website
from school at its new location. BTInternet for Schools,
in their wisdom, have decided it would pervert and
corrupt me. I do hope so... just in the comfort of
my own home now, then. |
| |
|