ok i don't know who wrote this one article
but a lot
of shit is wrong. nicotine isn't in weed. only dumb
asses put tobacco in weed.people who smoke ciggarettes
aren't fuckin losers. you don't lose ur sense of
reality from smoking. and smoking weed may damage u a
little bit but in the records no single person has
died from smoking it.and yo it its fine to be wasted
all the time look at the kotton mouth kings they're
stoned 24-7 and they're fine. get ur information right. |
Since when have you had access to "the
records"? Which records would these be?
I wrote the article and it does not suggest that nicotine is
in "weed".
Maybe you should read it when you are not stoned. Or if you
did the first time perhaps you should reassess your idea that
it does not matter if people are wasted all the time and that
it does not cause intellectual impairment. It seems to me that
you regard an attack on drug taking and smoking as a personal
attack on you. That "drug smoker" is the way you see
yourself. If that is the case you have a serious problem.
It is extremely sad and distinctly pathetic to identify yourself
with something you consume, whether that is a drug, music or
somebody else's religion. Try and get a life that involves producing,
creating or at the very least being something, not
just consuming something your mom doesn't like.
I hope the lifestyle comes together,
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org
|
When I was about 9
years old my mother told me about god. She told me that he could
see everything I did. But I had doubts and I thought about this
god for several months. I had very strong doubts that there
was any such god. One day I stood in the middle of a wide-open
hay field in July, raised my hands toward the clear sparsely
clouded sky, and told god to strike me dead. I was that confident
that no god existed.
leon |
Henna tattoos and PPD
Hi Martin,
While I would not even begin to try and
suggest that your daughter should do anything other than what
you tell her, I think a little research on henna will show
that it is a perfectly safe product. In all likelihood, given
the apparent design seen on your child's extremity, I would
assume that she wished to have a very dark tattoo. Pure henna
will only produce an orange to an orangeish red colors, not
the black or blue typically used in this style of tattoo.
To achieve a dark black or blue color a hair dye called PPD
is used. This chemical can indeed cause severe allergic reactions,
exactly like those shown on your web site.
Here's a link to a site that has some useful information about henna
and PPD.
http://allergies.about.com/library/blhennawarnings.htm
By the by, I enjoy your site.
Later Larry.
aa # 2216 |
 |
 |
She had the "tattoo" done in Rome on
a school trip. It was a week later before any reaction was noticed.
Since that photograph was taken her arm has got significantly
worse. She is now on antibiotics to cure a rash which is all
over her body. At first we blamed fleas and sprayed the house
and shoved a tablet down the cat's throat all to no avail. It
was clearly a reaction to an infection caused by the henna tattoo.
I asked her if I could take another photograph yesterday to
show how much worse it (her upper arm) looks now, her reaction: "in
your dreams!"
She has had henna tattoos done before, presumably with natural
henna, with no adverse reactions. She must be sensitive to PPD.
So I'll be telling her she can't be a Goth and dye her hair
black because she's too sensitive to black hair dye.
She has seen a doctor and has been advised that there may well
be noticeable permanent scarring but even a skin graft would
not be guaranteed to look any better.
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org
|
Any correspondence addressed to me containing the phrase “No
win no fee” will be treated with the contempt it deserves.
though i agree with
many of the things you write and cant help wondering if youre
not just replacing religion with science, you seem to blindly
quote science and put your faith in concepts like evolution
but at the end of the day arent these mere beliefs too?
andrew. |
The whole point about science is that it is not blind. Religious
faith is blind because The Truth is written in The Book, end of debate.
Science is rewriting the book all the time. If there is evidence
that evolution is untrue science will move on. If there is evidence
that evolution is true religion will decry it for all eternity.
Science doesn't blindly trust itself. Putting belief in anything
else is not being blind, it is being deliberately ignorant. Science
is rational, putting trust in anything else is irrational. “Alternative
ways of knowing” are simply wrong, unless proved valid by rational
methods. There is no rational reason to expect human minds to be
able to directly perceive truth, and thousands of years of evidence
that this ability does not exist.
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org
I only read part of your web site, I feel so sorry for you.
Maybe one day you will actually take the Bible and read it
with an open mind and especially an open heart. Do you only
believe things that you see? If so, then you don't believe
anything you hear because you don't see it. Do you believe
in WW1?....did you see it? If you allowed God into your heart
then you would see him work within you, it is amazing. We as
Christians are to pray for the lost and I will pray for you.
Maybe you will open yourself and realize that if you believe
with all your heart you won't go to the fiery burning hell.
You have alot of hostility within yourself or is this just
you trying to be cool, most people do grow out of trying to
be so cool, so sad that you haven't. |
Good Morning Martin,
I enjoyed your article, it is 'right on'.
Great logic you have, I lost all belief at 9 years of age and have never
understood how a human mind
can accept religious 'belief' my greatest hero of all time is Robert
Green Ingersoll, I am sure you have
read his essays, if not look him up, you will find his writtings of great
value.
Brian Gard (Pocatello Idaho - home of the 'incurably religious' |
Hello.
I am responding to your writings on the so-called fallacy
of the
American Dream. If I understand your position, you are saying that
people who produce wealth do so at the expense of those who produce
nothing. If that is your stance, please explain why you believe that
no person has a right to expect recompense for his/her own productive
effort. This means that these productive people are slaves to those
whose sole claim on the fruits of their labor is the fact that they
could not aspire to such a height themselves.
Wealth is not a static commodity to be distributed by some arbitrary
benefactor. It must be created. The person who invented the wheel did
so of his own volition, and owes nothing to any tribesman who
contributed nothing to that achievement. Why shouldn't he expect some
reward, when he has eased the burden on every human who follows him?
Ben Classon
|
If you understood my position. But you probably
don't.
The wheel story is a great one. How much was the patent
on the wheel worth? Nothing. There was no patent system.
The wheel was invented because it was useful. It was copied
because its usefulness was apparent. In what way is the inventor
of the wheel harmed by other people using wheels? How many
useful things were thought about but not made because the
inventor wanted to become a billionaire before it was worth
his while making his invention?
When do you expect to become a billionaire?
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org
|
When You Mean You Hug Tree's do you actually put your extremities
inside the holes of tree's also? If so, I would consider you
a tree fucker and not a tree hugger. Also why do tree's smell
like a da douche? U FUCKING DOUCHE BAG! |
Why do you hate so much? Are you a Christian?
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org
|
Yes actually I am a christian and also a contractor, I build
churches made of of tree's and print junk mail (made out of
tree's) which i am a proud member of color graphics inc. as
a well known pressman.
|
I thought so. You really can't beat a Christian for mindless
and illiterate hate and seeing the worst in people.
You must be so proud of yourself, spreading hate and ignorance
wherever you go.
Spoil the planet for Jesus and God
bless America, eh?
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org
|
BILL MAN wrote:
And I guess your Canadien, eh? |
When I publish this on my website people will think I made
you up.
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org
|
martin, this is really bad what you're doing. But let me
introduce myself. My name is Lori, i work as a perfume consultant
and as a result do occasional modelling work. I'm also doing
my bachalor of nursing and i live in sydney. I went to your
site because i was looking for some information for an assignment
i was doing and came across something that was so much worse.
Honestly, i think you're a really bad person. What you are
doing on this site is bringing out the hatred of this world.
You don't have to agree with the Bible, but what you do need
to do is respect it. There are so many people out there that
would happily kick the shit through yo if they saw you on
the street for what you have said. Making your site 'contraversial'
may get you higher site-ratings but what is set to come to
you is something that is so much worse that getting worldly
attention because of your 'contraversial site'. Saying the
Bible is a joke? mmm... that's real mature martin.
Whether you like it or not i will be praying. I know there's
a God and i know inside you do too. I just hope when the
time comes that God is merciful to you because there would
be nothing worse than not being saved.
Have a nice day martin
Lori
|
Why do I need to respect the Bible? It is a book of lies
that claims to define the very essence of truth: it is a blasphemy
against reason. Fiction that knows it is fiction I can cope
with, fiction that pretends it's true is annoying, fiction
that pretends it is superior to science is an insult to my
species and I that is an insult I take personally.
The Bible is full of lies. People have knowingly manipulated
the text to "predict" what had already happened.
People are still lying to support those earlier lies. No
matter how old a lie is it never becomes true and it never
deserves respect. All lies deserve uncovering, that is the
only moral thing to do with lies, paying them lip service
and pretending to respect them is spineless.
Human nature does not change, and has not changed in thousands
of years. People who start new religions today are charlatans
and/or madmen. People who started religions thousands of
years ago were charlatans and/or madmen. There was nothing
special about one particular tribe of genocidally inclined
goat herders. There was no Holy Land, no Biblical Times and
there is no Chosen People. Just people doing what people
have always done: tell each other stories and pretend to
understand what's really going on.
You are dead wrong. Deep down inside I know there are no
gods. It might suit you to think that everybody deep down
is actually you in denial but it isn't true.
Are many of your friends Christian shit kickers?
Didn't Christ once say "Blessèd are the shit
kickers"?
No. I don't believe he did.
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org
|
hey what was the womens name who was killed along with her
son and grandaughter? see what happen to them i bet they were
saying MY GOD, PLEASE DONT KILL ME! |
Hmmm. And when Robin said "Holy Mackerel Batman!" he
was demonstrating his fervent belief in a piscine deity?
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org
|
Dear Editor, I have what I feel to be an important question,
I'm 23 years old and married. I have no desire to ever have
any children, however my wife is 28 yrs. old and feels differently.
She recently "missed" a pill, not on purpose but
in the midst of returning home from vacation and after her
most recent period. My question is, and it may sound silly,
is there less potetnial for her to get pregnant if I masturbate
regualrly apporx. 3 times daily with having intercourse about
3 times per week? I guess partially what I'm trying to do is
keep my sperm count low on purpose because I have little faith
in birth control. I've even requested a vasectomy, but the
doctor won't go for it. Any advice you can give me would be
appreciated. Also I have thoroughly read your article but saw
that low/no masturbation as well as too much can keep a sperm
count low, but a more detailed opinion from you would be taken
seriously on my part.
Thank you ,
Sincerly
[name withheld] |
You wouldn't have the stamina to masturbate often enough
to prevent problems, your wrist might give out before your
penis. Masturbating as much as you want would be inclined to
make your ejaculate more fertile. To reduce the sperm count
to levels which would present a negligible risk you would need
to ejaculate six times in the hour before having sex, that
sort of feat is a once in a lifetime achievement for most men
and more suited to 16 year olds than 23 year olds.
If you are worried about your wife becoming pregnant use
condoms until her next period or stick to mutual masturbation,
it won't kill you for a few weeks, at least it is a lot less
likely to kill you than your original plan.
At the age of 23 I think your doctor is right about the
vasectomy, you are too young to make such an important decision.
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org
|
I hope I don't come off as insincere but I have a question
that I believe is relevant:
Why is Christianity such a problem?
If you are a firm Atheist who believes what he believes
and is happy with how he runs his life, then why do you devote
a life and website to arguing and deflating people who believe
otherwise? It should not be a big deal to you, let people
believe what they believe as long as it works for them. Your
atheism works for you, does it not? Then I don't see the
point.......why does everyone need to believe what you do?
You may say we don't, but read what you write and the spirit
in which it is written . You criticize others for what they
believe. I don't think a Christian would criticize/ridicule
you. You are told you are WRONG? Well if someone told me
I was wrong, it would not affect my belief if I was firm
in it, and I CERTAINLY would not be moved to blast them for
their stupidity. I respect a person who has strong beliefs,
whether I believe them to be right or wrong. Respect is what's
missing from this website.
On the topic of bitterness you say:
Some people accuse me of being bitter and twisted. Cynical
and sneering, belittling people who make a go of their lives.
Fair comment.
I quote "Atheism is a Gamble" in your website
, the ending to your response to Renee Florida's letter:
"Go on, waste your life spreading traditional lies
backed up with the fear of eternal torture, see if I care.
See if the universe cares."
My point is : Why do YOU care?
It shouldn't provoke such an emotional response. But Christ
has always provoked a strong response. You either believe
or you don't. It's sounds like you have been ridden high
and dry for not believing in God, but honestly, you should
be able to blow it off, your beliefs should bring you peace.
I've yet to come across an Atheist who ISN'T bitter. What's
the bitterness about??? Is it at the belief of a God that
lets evil things happen? Is it a life event? Why the FOCUS
on evil in the world in the first place, than at the good
the message that Christ brings? You might say, well those
that are lukewarm are just "wimps"........does
that make them less atheist and have less integrity? A Christian
who isn't a Billy Graham isn't less of a Christian. And it
would be bad logic to say they "just aren't as committed
in their belief. I don't see where Christianity hurts anyone.
If it enriches their life and makes them happy then where
is the harm? Is it an evil, immoral plan for life? No. Where
is the smoking gun? We'd all be better people if we followed
Jesus' example. Even if (as you say) Jesus didn't exist.
We both think we know how it is. But my point is, at the
end of the day, can't we respectfully disagree? If I had
a website about why you should believe in God, I would be
persuasive but not insulting. I would want to influence but
not preach. I would not talk condescendingly.
One last question on your statement on atheists who covert:
Why does an atheist who converts to Christianity prove he
was weak in his atheism BUT a Christian who becomes an Atheist
NOT PROVE he was WEAK in his Christianity ? You would say
the atheist just wasn't "well schooled enough",
but a Christian who falls, we can't say they just weren't
well schooled enough........ they must have finally" found
the light" of atheism.
Michele
|
Why do I care? Because I can see how much time and energy
is invested in lies. How many man-millennia of effort has been "invested" in
god-belief? Significantly more than has been channelled into
any other human endeavour of any kind. If that investment was
put into science and technology we would be having colonies
on the moons of, well, that big planet with the red spot named
after a god. If that effort had been put into building a free
and fair political structure there would be peace on Earth
and goodwill to all men and nobody would
have to get nailed to anything.
If everybody followed the example of Jesus where would the
world be? Let's think about that shall we. If everybody gave
up their work and went around with twelve accomplices begging
and telling everybody else how to live their life would the
world be a better place? If everybody did magic tricks to
convince the people watching that they were magic would the
world be a better place? If everybody got themselves tortured
to death to seal a bargain that nobody explained beforehand
or at the time in which they engineered their own death to
save the world from their father's wrath and so gained everlasting
life for everybody who believed the story without proof would
the world be a better place? No, it would be a world full
of crazy people obsessed with death and sacrifice.
The story of Jesus is the story of a madman, a travelling
beggar who did conjuring tricks, told stories and did a bit
of exorcism for theatrical effect. He didn't do anything
much to set an example to his followers except show how to
get killed, that seems to be his biggest legacy. When people "follow
in the footsteps of Christ" they do no such thing. People
do not go out and get themselves tortured and killed so their
followers can found a new religion in their name.
Your arrogance amazes me. You seem to think that I actually
believe in your stories and I am lying about being an atheist.
Not so. I did not go through the systematic brainwashing
that seems to be characteristic of Americans.
Why shouldn't I feel bitter? Billions of people are telling
each other lies and are slandering my species. I take that
personally. I don't see why people should be expected to
react angrily if people slander their family, race or nation
but should be as meek as a lamb when people systematically
slander the entire species. Religions slander me and my people
because they slander humanity. I see no reason to react differently
to being called immoral and evil as an individual or because
I belong to a particular species. "Preacher man, come
outside and say that to my face".
Atheists who convert to Christianity are no such thing.
The usual case is that they are half-indoctrinated (or more)
Christians going through puberty who think that by denying
God they can get laid, get drunk and take drugs with impunity
and appear smart. By denying God he ceases to exist and they
are free to do what they want. Then they find out that there
aren't that many people who actually want to have sex with
them who they want to have sex with. The "liberation" palls
and they start to feel guilty again. Childhood conditioning
reasserts itself, they start to want to believe in God again
so he can exist (either to love them or to punish bad people,
and sometimes both) and POOF by the magic of their cosmic
consciousness God becomes real again. I despise such people,
those who think reality is affected by their beliefs: arrogant
tossers.
I despise people who choose to believe, whatever they believe.
Belief should be involuntary: this is what I must believe,
but the compulsion should never be imposed from outside.
Religions impose creeds which are lists of statements that
the "believer" is expected to make a point of believing.
That is indoctrination and it is evil. Always.
We believe in one God,
the Father, the Almighty,
maker of heaven and earth,
of all that is, seen and unseen.
We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ,
the only Son of God,
eternally begotten of the Father,
God from God, light from light,
true God from true God,
begotten, not made,
of one Being with the Father;
through him all things were made.
For us and for our salvation
he came down from heaven,
was incarnate of the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary
and became truly human.
For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate;
he suffered death and was buried.
On the third day he rose again
in accordance with the Scriptures;
he ascended into heaven
and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead,
and his kingdom will have no end.
We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of
life,
who proceeds from the Father [and the Son],
who with the Father and the Son is worshipped and glorified,
who has spoken through the prophets.
We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church.
We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.
We look for the resurrection of the dead,
and the life of the world to come. Amen.
You will believe this. We all do. You will be assimilated
into the church. Resistance is futile. You will accept every
line. Say it. Say it. No wine until you say it. If you don't
say it you're evil and nobody will like you. Say it. Believe
it. Say it like you mean it. Say it!
I never tell anybody to believe what I believe, I explain
what I believe and invite them to consider it. When people
tell me they agree with me I feel good, and then I go back
and check to see if I can't come up with something even better.
I have just found out my daughter is an atheist today, and
has been for about three years. I am delighted. I don't make
anybody believe anything, I explain what I believe and invite
them to agree with me.
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org
|
Martin,
Though I appreciate your candid point of view on many topics, there was
one paragraph in the "Atheism" section I took objection to.
I believe it is mentioned that anyone who believes in Fate, astrology,
and Feng Shui is a "weirdo". I have always considered myself
an idealistic agnostic, my "deity" is Fate, and I do practice
both Western and Chinese astrology. It wasn't the "weirdo" part
that chafed me, however, but the "open, vacant mind" part.
Open mind, yes. Vacant? Never. In fact, you might be surprised how many
intelligent people believe in Fate. But to chastise someone for their
beliefs... what does that say about your intelligence level? This type
of elitist behavior is something I would expect from a hard-nosed fire-and-brimstone
Baptist. To think that someone who apparently has such forward-thinking
views on other subjects could mock another's belief... but I guess that's
part of me being an idealist. Instead of wasting space on what could
be a thought-provoking topic, shouldn't you be trying to promote religious
tolerance - for all belief systems - and not painting people who have
different beliefs (ie the "weirdoes") as backwards-thinking
dunces?
Corrine
|
Fate means the future
sucks and that what goes around affects what comes around.
I don't see any evidence for that and I don't see any evidence
for a mechanism, I don't see how such a mechanism could operate
and I don't see any reason for such a mechanism to exist.
In the absence of such evidence I don't believe in such concepts.
I don't see any reason to be tolerant of error, unjustified
superstition or wishful thinking. And I don't see any reason
to apologize for having rational views and expressing them.
I don't claim that people who believe in fate are stupid,
I believe they are wrong, and your defence of your beliefs
seems to be able to be summed up as “aww, please don't
call me stupid”. You're not stupid, you're wrong, that
is what I will continue to believe until I am presented with
a good case for changing my mind.
Are you prepared to put your beliefs to the test of sceptical
questioning?
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org
|
|
|